Psychometric evaluation of the Negative Religious Coping (NRC) Scale of the Brief RCOPE in the Czech environment
The Negative Religious Coping (NRC) Subscale is a part of the Brief RCOPE Scale, but can also be used separatelly. It is a brief measure assessing negative religous coping. The aim of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the NRC in Czech conditions. The NRC was administered to 531 religious r...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Beteiligte: | ; ; ; |
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
2019
|
In: |
Mental health, religion & culture
Jahr: 2019, Band: 22, Heft: 6, Seiten: 614-625 |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
spiritual struggles
B Negative Religious Coping B Spirituality/religiosity B Psychometric evaluation B NRC scale of the Brief RCOPE |
Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Zusammenfassung: | The Negative Religious Coping (NRC) Subscale is a part of the Brief RCOPE Scale, but can also be used separatelly. It is a brief measure assessing negative religous coping. The aim of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the NRC in Czech conditions. The NRC was administered to 531 religious respondents (25.5 ± 3.4 years, 43.5% male). Negative religious coping and religiosity, together with basic sociodemographic information, were measured. The non-parametric comparison of different sociodemographic groups showed no differences between genders and almost no differences among the age groups. Significantly lower NRC scores were obtained by widows/widowers. The Czech version of the NRC showed a coherent one-dimensional factor structure and high reliability, with Cronbach’s α = .84 (95% CI .83-.85) and McDonald’s ωt = .90. Our findings indicate that the Czech version of the NRC scale may reliably assess religious coping. This instrument might be useful both for research and clinical praxis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-9737 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Mental health, religion & culture
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13674676.2019.1597033 |