Slavery, Human Rights and Visas

A case study of yet unpublished material from the French colonial archives shows that the administration carefully watched the work of Christian missionaries in Cameroon. This surveillance stemmed from the administration’s fear of local rebellion due to the missionaries’ influence. In the North, the...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Drønen, Tomas Sundnes (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2016
Dans: Mission studies
Année: 2016, Volume: 33, Numéro: 3, Pages: 251-274
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Kamerun / Frankreich / Colonie / Det Norske Misjonsselskap / Mission / Histoire 1840-1950
RelBib Classification:KAH Époque moderne
KAJ Époque contemporaine
KBE Scandinavie
KBG France
KBN Afrique subsaharienne
RJ Mission
Sujets non-standardisés:B Cameroon history of mission French colonial administration Norwegian missionaries Peuls slavery
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:A case study of yet unpublished material from the French colonial archives shows that the administration carefully watched the work of Christian missionaries in Cameroon. This surveillance stemmed from the administration’s fear of local rebellion due to the missionaries’ influence. In the North, the fear was that Christian mission would provoke the previously militarily powerful Fulbe to a rebellion similar to those the French had experienced in their North African colonies. The Norwegian missionaries took an active stance against local slavery, and visa applications for nine new missionaries in 1950 became the impetus for intensive surveillance from the French administration. The visa struggle and the struggle over domestic slavery also show that the administration had established a political culture that only reluctantly gave priority to serious human rights issues over respect for local traditions, and that they had established a regime of strict control over religious activities.
Description matérielle:Online-Ressource
ISSN:1573-3831
Contient:In: Mission studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15733831-12341463