Creation and salvation in Edward Schillebeeckx. Well-being as more about Jesus’ death and less about resurrection
This paper is not merely an attempt to come to terms with Edward Schillebeeckx’s theology and his philosophical mindset. Such attempts have already been made years back, when his ties with phenomenology, and also with postmodern hermeneutics and culture were pivotal for us in order to better underst...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
[2017]
|
| Dans: |
Journal for the study of religions and ideologies
Année: 2017, Volume: 16, Numéro: 46, Pages: 34-48 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Schillebeeckx, Edward 1914-2009
/ Création
/ Rédemption
/ Bien-être
|
| RelBib Classification: | CB Spiritualité chrétienne NBF Christologie NBK Sotériologie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Schillebeeckx
B Salvation B Resurrection B Well-being B communion with God B Creation B ancestral faith B Death B philosophical mindset |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | This paper is not merely an attempt to come to terms with Edward Schillebeeckx’s theology and his philosophical mindset. Such attempts have already been made years back, when his ties with phenomenology, and also with postmodern hermeneutics and culture were pivotal for us in order to better understand his influence on mid-20th century Continental philosophy. This present study partially remains on those premises, but also brings Schillebeeckx’s thought closer to the 21st century, since nowadays concepts like salvation and resurrection tend to embed particular meanings, such as well-being and ancestrality, which until recently were considered halfway synonyms of the previous images, and thus were looked upon with less persuasion. This study follows their interchangeable use in Schillebeeckx’s doctrine of creation, where the purpose of the Christian creedal formula is to appease in a tribal sense, rather than to function as a confession of faith. On the other hand, Schillebeeckx’s take on the resurrection as a means to reconnect humanity to its ancestral faith will further be inspected as the starting point of his rehabilitated anthropology or the humanum. The initial discussion on the relationship between God and Jesus in the history of salvation finalized with Jesus’ death receives a new turn in Schillebeeckx’s thought when in this same context he talks about the resurrection. Jesus’ status after the resurrection is analyzed here considering the tribal flavors it receives in Schillebeeckx’s work with an accent on its outcome for the new humanity and its well-being. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1583-0039 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of religions and ideologies
|