Evan Fales on the Possibility of Divine Causation
Evan Fales has argued that divine causation is not possible. His central argument involves an analysis of causation that requires that there has to be a mapping feature to guarantee that the particular effect follows the particular cause. He suggests that being related in space and time will provide...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[2015]
|
| In: |
Sophia
Jahr: 2015, Band: 54, Heft: 1, Seiten: 25-34 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus NBC Gotteslehre VA Philosophie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Universals
B Causation B Cause B God |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Evan Fales has argued that divine causation is not possible. His central argument involves an analysis of causation that requires that there has to be a mapping feature to guarantee that the particular effect follows the particular cause. He suggests that being related in space and time will provide the means to map the right effects onto their causes. In this paper, I argue that the spatial relation between cause and effect is not necessary to the causal relation. In cases of volition, it appears that the mapping of particular effects onto volitions is achieved by the intentional content of the volition. Therefore, spatial relations are not necessary to causation and the impossibility of divine causation has not been shown. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-014-0425-1 |