Charismatic Cultures
While confirming Heuser and Klaus’s twenty-year-old warning about the shadow side of charismatic leadership in pentecostal organizations, the article points out the leader-centric bias in this and similar works and seeks to advance the discussion by addressing charismatic leadership from a structure...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Collaborateurs: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publié: |
2018
|
Dans: |
Pneuma
Année: 2018, Volume: 40, Numéro: 1/2, Pages: 109-129 |
RelBib Classification: | KAJ Époque contemporaine KDG Église libre NBG Pneumatologie NBN Ecclésiologie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Pentecostal
charisma
leadership
agency / structure
ethical leadership
culture
|
Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Verlag) |
Résumé: | While confirming Heuser and Klaus’s twenty-year-old warning about the shadow side of charismatic leadership in pentecostal organizations, the article points out the leader-centric bias in this and similar works and seeks to advance the discussion by addressing charismatic leadership from a structure/agency perspective. Drawing on Margaret Archer’s critical realist framework, the authors go beyond the focus on the sole charismatic leader to suggest that all partners in the leadership relation bear responsibility for avoiding destructive charismatic cultures and promoting ethical agency. The study proposes that it is possible to have forms of charismatic leadership that reflect pentecostal characteristics without being destructive if organizations promote reflexivity, ethical policies and moral accountability, and active followership. |
---|---|
Description matérielle: | Online-Ressource |
ISSN: | 1570-0747 |
Contient: | In: Pneuma
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700747-04001002 |