Epistemic Angst, Intellectual Courage and Radical Scepticism

The overarching aim of this paper is to persuade the reader that radical scepticism is driven less by independently plausible arguments and more by a fear of epistemic limitation which can be overcome. By developing the Kierkegaardian insight that knowledge requires courage, I show that we are not,...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Schönbaumsfeld, Genia 1973- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: [2019]
Dans: International journal for the study of skepticism
Année: 2019, Volume: 9, Numéro: 3, Pages: 206-222
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Pritchard, Duncan 1974-, Epistemic angst / Acquisition des connaissances / Scepticisme
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
VA Philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B intellectual courage
B Kierkegaard
B Reasons Identity Thesis
B epistemic angst
B Cartesian picture
B radical skepticism
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:The overarching aim of this paper is to persuade the reader that radical scepticism is driven less by independently plausible arguments and more by a fear of epistemic limitation which can be overcome. By developing the Kierkegaardian insight that knowledge requires courage, I show that we are not, as potential knowers, just passive recipients of a passing show of putatively veridical information, we also actively need to put ourselves in the way of it by learning to resist certain forms of epistemic temptation: the Cartesian thought that we could be ‘imprisoned' within our own representations, and, hence permanently ‘out of touch' with an ‘external' world, and the Reasons Identity Thesis, which has us believe that whether we are in the good case or in the bad case, our epistemic grounds are the same.
ISSN:2210-5700
Contient:Enthalten in: International journal for the study of skepticism
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/22105700-20191388