Cosmology, Gender, Structure, and Rhythm: Marcel Granet and Chinese Religion in the History of Social Theory

This article interrogates the near-complete absence of China as a source of materials and inspiration for constructing theoretical concepts and models in mainstream sociology and anthropology. I outline the story of the largely forgotten mutual engagements, influences, and missed connections between...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Palmer, David A. 1969- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: [2019]
Dans: Review of Religion and Chinese Society
Année: 2019, Volume: 6, Numéro: 2, Pages: 160-187
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Granet, Marcel 1884-1940 / China / Religion / Théorie sociologique / Durkheim, Émile 1858-1917 / Mauss, Marcel 1872-1950 / Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1908-2009
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
AD Sociologie des religions
AG Vie religieuse
BM Religions chinoises
KBM Asie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Marcel Granet
B Marcel Mauss
B 艾弥尔·涂尔干
B 马塞尔·莫斯
B China
B Emile Durkheim
B 马塞尔·葛兰言
B 中国
B 列维·斯特劳斯
B Claude Lévi-Strauss
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This article interrogates the near-complete absence of China as a source of materials and inspiration for constructing theoretical concepts and models in mainstream sociology and anthropology. I outline the story of the largely forgotten mutual engagements, influences, and missed connections between the work of the French sociologist and sinologist Marcel Granet (1884-1940), whose work revolved around Chinese religion, and key figures in the history of sociological and anthropological theory, exemplified by Durkheim, Mauss, and Lévi-Strauss. My purpose is to restore Granet—and, through Granet, China—in the genealogy of classical anthropological and social theory. This involves showing how Granet’s work was informed by the theoretical debates that animated his mentors and colleagues in the French sociological school, and how he, in turn, directly or indirectly influenced subsequent theoretical developments. It also involves raising questions about the implications of connections that were missed, or only briefly evoked, by theoreticians in subsequent generations. These questions open bridges for advancing a mutually productive dialogue between the study of Chinese cosmology, religion, and society, and theory construction in sociology and anthropology.
ISSN:2214-3955
Contient:Enthalten in: Review of Religion and Chinese Society
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/22143955-00602002