Nishida Kitarō and Muhammad ‘Abduh on God and reason: Towards a theology of place
I compare the Japanese philosopher Nishida Kitaro (1870–1945) with the Egyptian philosopher and reformer Muhammad ‘Abduh (1849–1905). Both philosophies emerged within similar cultural contexts. Both thinkers attempt to think relationships between the individual and the universal through organic mode...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2022
|
| Dans: |
Asian philosophy
Année: 2022, Volume: 32, Numéro: 2, Pages: 105-125 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Nishida, Kitarō 1870-1945
/ ʿAbduh, Muḥammad 1849-1905
/ Dieu
/ Tawḥīd
/ Singularité (Philosophie)
/ Logique
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion BJ Islam KBL Proche-Orient et Afrique du Nord KBM Asie NBC Dieu VB Herméneutique; philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Tawhīd
B Islamic Philosophy B Nishida Kitaro B Philosophy of religion B Muhammad ‘Abduh B Japanese philosophy B philosophy of space |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | I compare the Japanese philosopher Nishida Kitaro (1870–1945) with the Egyptian philosopher and reformer Muhammad ‘Abduh (1849–1905). Both philosophies emerged within similar cultural contexts. Both thinkers attempt to think relationships between the individual and the universal through organic models. In parallel, both philosophies produce paradoxical positions regarding the integration of reason and religion. Like ‘Abduh, Nishida is interested in the unity of God. How do we have to think the unity of God when every unity is only composed of individuals? ‘Abduh avoids Aristotelian substances by claiming that the physical world emerges. Similarly, Nishida thinks that the world emerges as a place (basho). Both conceptions contradict Aristotelian logic because both avoid the idea of identity, which is necessary for any abstract logic. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-2961 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Asian philosophy
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/09552367.2022.2044453 |